Ethical
Harvesting Group discussion reports:
|
Representatives
of the following countries attended the discussion groups- Norway, Denmark,
England, Scotland, Finland, USA, Australia,
|
Some
info about Holland
and south Germany was available. The following report represents the
views expressed at the discussion groups.
|
|
How
do you collect fungi?
|
- Consensus
was that you only tell people you can trust.
In Finland an introduction to dye fungi to new dyers has resulted in
the area being cleaned out other participants have found this
happening too.
|
- Most
sites are shared with others known or unknown.
|
- Most
pick for their own use or for workshops and do not sell.
|
- In
Sweden and Norway the fungi population is so intense that they feel
they are unlikely to suffer any
threat to supply or habitat.
|
- UK,
Denmark , Sweden and the USA have red lists of endangered species and
in Finland polypores are
not collected because they are more scarce and thought to be a
vulnerable species.
|
- In
Finland the government actually promotes commercial picking and offers
tax incentives for berry and fungi pickers. They want to utilize
natural produce to gain income for lower income groups. There are
instruction sessions to advise commercial pickers on the correct fungi
to gather to help avoid “accidents”
They have so much fungi they have kicking competitions !!
|
- Some
people felt there were so few people picking dye fungi that worrying
about picking was not an issue
|
- Some
people are alarmed at the growth of commercial picking and the damage
it is doing to the habitat and the perceived need for regulation which
would affect us picking dye fungi.
|
- Picking
to sell in Scandinavia is the norm and this is helpful to those of us
who cannot source enough fungi.
|
|
Picking
-Country information
|
- Countries
where you cannot pick without a permit- Holland, Australia. In
Australia the permits are often given for one season only and you are
required to present a return of your collection i.e. species,
quantity and where it was found.
|
- England-Policy
of no picking in some areas to counteract destruction of habitat
caused by excessive picking of edible fungi. South Germany - Can pick
on specific days or only specific amounts
|
- Free
to pick- Scotland, Norway, Sweden, Finland
|
- In
Scotland there is now estimated to be 600 commercial pickers.
|
- USA-
permits required for National forests and limited to 5lbs per day in
some state forests. Picking is forbidden in National parks. Some
national lands require permits for picking for personal use as well.
|
- Denmark
commercial picking is not allowed in public areas.
|
|
Fungi
FORAYS for identification and collection
|
Group
leader responsibilities:
|
- must
have a permit or permission of landowner
|
- must
be someone with good
knowledge of dye fungi
|
- Keep
a record of what is found where e.g. through photography/ OS map reference
etc.
|
- Should
have knowledge of quantities needed of each species for a good dyebath- this
would need to be checked out by the foray leader before each foray
|
- Knowledge
of which fungi are on the red list
|
- Ethics
of picking should be part of talk at beginning of foray
|
Good
practice in picking should encompass:
|
Education
in: a) harvesting only mature
specimens
|
b) learning not to disturb the substrata
|
c) discussion on loss of habitat
|
d)
keep a record of species, quantity and where found
|
Good
Practice in Dyeing
|
- advice on choice of mordant, disposal of mordant
|
|
|
|
Assumptions
and Research
|
1.
There is a generally held view that picking the fruiting bodies will not
threaten the continuity of the species. There seems to be no scientific work or
field studies to support this common sense view.
|
- For
instance the view that lichens take a long time to grow is not supported by
local evidence. Could there be a difference between fungi species in growth
rate ?
|
- One
person said they only pick species found on dead wood and assumed that as
the fungi was killing the tree that there was no harm done. We need to help
people understand the nature and purpose
of fungi.
|
- Some
people had a rule to only pick two thirds of the fungi available . If
everyone adopted the two thirds rule one after the other there would be
nothing left !!!
|
2.
There is a need to understand the relationship between local knowledge
and modern mobility: that is to say that whilst we can observe and know our
own impact on the local environment, when travelling to other locations we do
not see the impact.
|
3.
We need hard evidence not supposition
to support our collecting activities e.g.- because a species grows
abundantly along a human path in
the forest ,it does not indicate
that fungi is abundant in the forest only that the path provides an ideal
habitat.
|
4.
How best to pick fungi - are
scissors or sharp knife a good idea? Has any research been done on this?
|
5.
Research into forest management
and reasons for variance in abundance in the different countries.
|
6.
There is concern in both USA
and Australia over spread of pathogens ”Phythophora
sp. in particular. Both countries stress education, sterilization of
equipment, boots and need for habitat conservation.
|
|
IFFS
Guideline suggestions:
|
|
1.
Know fully your own
country’s regulations
|
2.
create guidelines for
practice and husbandry- know what to pick and how to pick it
|
3.
Forays: delegate
collectors- for identification specimens
|
Recorders- species ,habitat, site reference
|
Photographers.
|
In this way
you avoid unnecessary duplication of specimens
|
4.
Collection
rule; if you do not see enough for your needs do not collect-unless
drying facilities are available
|
5.
Know the species
|
6.
Groups should offer training sessions and have photographic material
available or collect ‘voucher’
specimens.
|
7.
Groups should offer advice on quantities: how to extract and utilize
maximum dye: how to make test samples from small quantities
|
8.
Groups should undertake/ support/encourage research in the sustainable
production of dye fungi. E.g. one
member said she left a straw bale outside in the wet and it became covered in
fungi. Such simple methods suitable for seeding with dye fungi should be tried
and results shared internationally.
|
9.
Health and safety- good practice should be researched and explained
i.e. face masks against spores: no tasting as identification unless
experienced!!
|
10.
Because a system of permits might be introduced in many countries it
was felt that having guidelines for good practice, keeping records of
collection, habitats and quantities, conducting experiments with sustainable
growing etc. would put fungi dye groups in good positions to argue their case
for collection permits
|
Conclusions
|
1).
As more European countries introduce legislation and permits commercial pickers
will then descend on the ‘prolific ‘ Scandinavian countries and will not act
responsibly and these countries might find the sustainability of fungi under
threat . One example of a precedent for irresponsible picking was with the
‘purple dye lichen’ in the “C19”
|
(The gathering of lichens for the cudbear industry in Scotland.
When supplies of the lichens were exhausted in Scotland then boats set sail for
Norway and Sweden and virtually
depleted the stocks there. In the end there were ships sailing the oceans
gathering lichens in the Mediterranean, the Canary islands, right down the west
coast of Africa etc. and many other parts. Interestingly though the lichens did
eventually recover and are still found in those places today, but were being
gathered by the boatload for many years. I was suggesting that something similar
could occur if wild picking gains popularity at the same time as some countries
place restrictions on picking.
If
there is money in it people will travel to other countries and pick on a large
scale. At the moment Finland is actually encouraging this as source of income in
rural parts, but they may pay the
price later and be forced into eventually protect their resource.
- ( Su Grierson, Scotland)
|
2).
Consensus
view was that destruction of habitat was the greatest threat and dyers need to
be promoting good practice in identification, forays, collecting, dye workshops
and paper making etc. The
proposal to discuss further “ The
management of the land for biodiversity” was of interest. |
3).
All groups felt that IFFS could draw up general
good practice guidelines, but each country is responsible for developing its
guidelines which fit their own local and
national situation
|
4).
If IFFS has a code it should be available to all groups with an interest in
fungi.
|
5).
Future
Symposia
– host country to give information to delegates on custom and practice
relevant to the activities and a list of fungi
available and what is endangered in that area.
|