Why I believe Mr. Gothard
and the Institute in Basic Life
Principles have cult-like characteristics.
D. Thomas Owsley
It
must be made clear that I do not believe Mr. Gothard nor his Institute is a
cult. Strictly speaking, a cult deviates from essential and historic Christian
orthodoxy. However, there are points at which I believe Mr. Gothard and his
Institute are heretical. I do maintain that he and the Institute exhibit
cult-like traits, which is a cause for alarm.
I
am indebted to Mr. Matt Slick, M.Div. of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry for outlining the basic
traits of a modern cult.[1]
It is this material which I have found helpful in making the following
comparison. While there are apparent similarities to me, it was interesting to
discover that I was not alone in making such an assessment.[2]
The
question I have for those who adhere to Mr. Gothard’s teachings and his Institute in Basic Life Principles
(IBLP) is: What can you get from him and the Institute that you cannot get from a
biblically solid, evangelical, orthodox church whose pastor and elders are
concerned with Truth and Truth applied?
Unorthodox, esoteric, with a
devotion to a Adherents
and enthusiasts of the Institute are devoted
person, object, or set of
new ideas. followers of Mr.
Gothard and his new ideas.
Much of what he teaches are labeled as “keys,”
“secrets,” etc. indicating that this is something new
which until Mr. Gothard had discovered them would
still be hidden. He continues to reveal new teachings
previously unknown.
IBLP has maintained a policy of secrecy over the
years about its materials. One had to have attended
a seminar in order to obtain written material. The
reason was under the pretext that someone might
misinterpret or corrupt the information. “You had to
be there to understand,” is the oft given reason.
It has been said by several IBLP students that
“Mr. Gothard has wonderful teachings. You’ve
got to come to this seminar - it’s life-changing!
There’s nothing like it anywhere!”
Often isolationist. This is frequently observed among Gothard/Institute
enthusiasts. They are quite comfortable and relaxed
around others involved in the Institute, but often
withdrawn, or deliberately segregated even from
others within their own church. The claim is that they
wish to remain “pure.”
Many cults have non-verifiable belief systems. More frequent than not, Mr. Gothard gives
“proof” of his teachings. He uses testimonials, and medical or scientific research, but he does not give the source, at least not in a manner which can be verified.
His doctrine of the rhema, that God speaks personally
to each individual through the logos-Word, is quite
subjective. It is quite the challenge to argue against
someone who claims to have
received an inspired word from God.
The leader is often
charismatic who is very
special because he or she
has:
(a) received special revelation from God Though I know of no place where Gothard states
he receives special revelation from God, he implies
it by presenting “new” teachings, or by receiving
rhemas (inspired teachings from God) about a truth or
situation, which at times becomes a new principle or
topic for a seminar.
(b) claims to be appointed by God for a mission I have been told by followers of Gothard that God has
appointed him for this special mission. This is the
reason why he is celibate: to devote all his life to the
work of IBLP.
( c) claims to have special abilities Aside from implying that God has given him ability to
receive new insights, teachings, or principles about
life, I am not aware that he claims any other such
abilities.
The leader is often above
reproach and is not to There
is a shade of this with Mr. Gothard. While he
be denied or contradicted. has given a public invitation for people to correct him,
there is little if any evidence that he has changed his
methods, teachings, or principles. Further, his
longstanding refusal to meet with Dr. R. B. Allen,
Th.D. about his hermeneutics or interpretations of
Scripture give the appearance that he is beyond
correction.
It is quite interesting that a frequent response given
by Mr. Gothard to his critics is that he has been
misunderstood or misquoted.
Along this line, followers of Mr. Gothard and the
Institute accept his teachings as superior, over and
against the teachings of the local pastor and elders.
On several occasions I have witnessed people who
adhere to the IBLP refuse to accept doctrinal correction from their pastor, elders, or Bible teachers because it runs contrary to Mr. Gothard’s principles.
In terms of priorities, IBLP followers will attend an IBLP function rather than a local church event if given the option. Also, there is a tendency by followers of the Institute to flee the local church if the church does not teach, conform, or promote things in keeping with IBLP. The net effect is that Mr. Gothard is their spiritual leader and “pastor”. Not a few churches have endured such conflict.
This leads to a fundamental problem with Mr. Gothard and the IBLP: while they claim to uphold
the local church, in reality they usurp the role and
authority of the local church. As a parachurch organization Gothard and the IBLP are not under the oversight of a God-ordained, established church, hence biblical leaders. In other words, he has no biblically sanctioned accountability for his ministry. This is unbiblical, and effectively contradicts his teaching on the chain of authority.
The ethics of a cult:
(a) typically seek to do good works There is a strong emphasis upon performance and
doing good things as defined by Mr. Gothard and the
IBLP. The stress on developing and exhibiting good
character is commendable to a degree. It is commonly
a stress without the recognition for the work of Christ
and the need of the Holy Spirit. This is why many
non-Christian organizations, schools, prisons, and
even religions are using IBLP materials.
Such an incredible stress to perform has kept many
believers in a constant doubt about their salvation.
They lack the true joy and peace of true assurance
of the work of Christ in the lives.
(b) Usually moral and possess a good standard The families I know who are involved in
the IBLP’s teachings are very hard workers. They
present themselves as clean, wholesome, upstanding citizens. While there is nothing wrong with that in and of itself, the pressure to perform and always do right as defined by the Institute appears to be tremendous. His emphasis upon obtaining good character is all encompassing and the core of his teaching.
(c ) The Bible is often used or additional Mr. Gothard uses Scripture,
but uses it to prove his
“scriptures” are penned. When the Bible principles. His method of exegeting the Bible has been
is used, it is distorted with private a point of criticism and concern by many evangelical
interpretations. Bible scholars over the years. He frequently
makes passages say things they don’t say, or takes
Scripture verses out of context to support his principles. While Mr. Gothard does not write new “scriptures,” he does exegete nature (animals), and interpret so-called scientific or medical studies from which he derives spiritual principles.[3]
(d) Many cults recruit Jesus as one of their Mr. Gothard, does not, to my
knowledge, do this.
own and redefine him accordingly.
[1] Mr. Slick’s webpage on the Internet is located at www.carm.org.
[2] Mr. G. Richard Fisher has written A Study in Evolving Fadism: The Cultic Leanings of Bill Gothard’s Teachings in the quarterly Journal of Personal Freedom Outreach, St. Louis, Missouri, April-June, 1996, pp. 5-11. Others have also written along the same theme.
[3] Mr. Ron Henzel of R.E.S.T. Ministries has written a two-part excellent article entitled Bill Gothard’s Evangelical Talmud. The website can be visited at www.geocities.com on the internet.