Summary of Findings from Analysis of
Flaked Stone Materials from the Skyrocket Site

10 February 1998




Under Construction




FLAKED STONE ANALYSIS

David G. Bieling

Flaked stone analysis of the materials recovered during the archaeological investigations at the Skyrocket site have been the result of efforts by several individuals over a period of eight years. During earlier phases of these investigations, Dr. James Bennyhoff, John Dougherty, Rusty Weisman, and Michael Rondeau examined the collections and made important contributions to the project. Bennyhoff's observations on at least 1091 items, mostly flaked stone, were recorded by assistants during several sessions March - May 1992 and provide a range of typological and chronometric information useful for understanding the collection. His efforts focused on linking diagnostic artifact forms to established cultural phases. As such, his contributions helped develop the chronologic framework applied to the Skyrocket collection.

Rondeau contributed several reports discussing various aspects of the collections, particularly with regards to the materials from the West and Northeast loci (Rondeau and Rondeau 1990, 1991). His contributions provided the groundwork for much of the subsequent research. The portions of the collections allocated to him for study, however, were often a mix of different time periods and technologies. Based on his extensive familiarity with flaked stone collections from the Sierra Nevada and adjoining regions, he identified temporally significant attributes characterizing assemblages within the Skyrocket materials. The results of these studies are not reported here verbatim but integrated when they contribute to the objectives of the project.

Dougherty and Weisman were present throughout the course of field investigations and, consequently, may have viewed more of the collection than any other individuals. Both recognized significant attributes of the flaked stone assemblages during and after excavation. Their experience helped guide further in-field investigation and provide direction for future research.

The study presented below is the result of several months of effort spanning a four-year period. During the various periods when analysis was conducted, not all materials were available for examination, nor was the entire debitage collection ever thoroughly sorted by an experienced lithic analyst to identify fragments potentially misclassified during initial sorts. Materials from the upper components--all artifacts from 160cm and above--were examined during a four-week period in winter, 1992/1993. These included 858 items (a small number previously examined by Rondeau) which were briefly described on 88 pages of notes. These notes are in the possession of the author and CSU Fresno's Anthropology Laboratory. Materials from the Deep Component were examined on several occasions comprising a longer period of time. A complete organized classification, however, was not possible due to time and space constraints; items were identified and in most instances, rough sorted.

Needless to say, the time allotted for analysis was insufficient to the task. The sample examined might comprise better than approximately 95% of the recovered artifacts and perhaps less than 10% of the debitage. This includes virtually all the artifacts recovered from the upper soil strata within components 4-1 and about 90% of those from the deep component (8) and the TGC (Component 7-5). Samples of debitage selected for attribute analysis by CSUF students were examined on several occasions and most of the obsidian debitage from Component 8 was examined after the fact. All data used herein for calculations and tables was supplied by the principal investigators of the project.

The earliest flaked stone assemblage identified at Skyrocket is attributed to a Sierra foothill aspect of the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (WPLT). Dated approximately 9200-9000 b.p. at this site by radiocarbon analysis, the assemblage was recovered from the deep clay strata designated Component 8. These strata include the Gray Clay (GRC), Black Clay (BC), Green Clay (GC), and Feature 212 Fill (FEF). Although it was initially believed the materials from this assemblage were horizontally and vertically mixed with materials from another, presumably non-contemporaneous component, recent re-examination indicates some vertical differentiation might exist; this topic is discussed in another section of the final report.

Following the WPLT, the Stanislaus Phase represents an early Archaic assemblage characterized by attributes that differ dramatically in some respects from the WPLT but show similarities to other mid-Holocene collections throughout the Desert West. This assemblage was recovered primarily from the deep clay strata though like the previous assemblage, some materials also derived from the overlying TGC. Radiocarbon assays and obsidian hydration data placed this component approximately 8000-6900 b.p.

Materials morphologically similar to items within both the WPLT and Stanislaus Phase assemblages were identified within other soil strata albeit in much smaller numbers. Their presence in these upper strata can be explained primarily on the basis of the site's complex geomorphological history. It is also quite possible that the later of these assemblages was represented by occupations associated with strata within the TGC/DBGC series. Artifact scavenging by later occupants might also account for some of this.

Although two assemblages are defined for Component 8, additional flaked stone items recovered from the clay strata might indicate the presence of a third. Long-stemmed points of the Lake Mojave series could be affiliated with one or both of the defined assemblages or represent another less distinct component. This topic is discussed in greater detail below.

Calaveran Phase materials were recovered from the TGC strata and South Central strata 2 and 3. Moratto places this phase within the time period 5500-3000 b.p. (Moratto, in press). These dates are supported to some degree by radiocarbon and obsidian hydration data from the Skyrocket site. At the study site, Components 7-5 are dated 6,670 - 4,890 b.p., the lower end of the temporal spectrum could be attributed to the preceding Stanislaus Phase occupations or represent an earlier date for initiation of the Calaveras Phase.

An Upper Archaic Period assemblage attributed to the Sierra Phase (ca. 3000-1500 b.p.) was recovered primarily from the soil strata defining Components 4-1--Transitional, and Light, Medium, and Dark Brown Surface Loams (Trans, LBSL, MBSL, DBSL). Some materials associated with this assemblage also derived from the underlying TGC, possibly as a result of intrusive burials. Likewise, some materials from the preceding Calaveras Phase assemblage might have been recovered from these upper soil strata.

Materials attributable to the Redbud Phase (ca. 1500-700 b.p.) were identified in the collection, however, the assemblage is not well-represented at this site and definition of its flaked stone characteristics is limited. Typologically diagnostic items and obsidian hydration data constitute most of the temporal evidence for materials attributable to this assemblage.

Horseshoe Bend Phase materials were also recovered from mixed deposits in the brown surface loams. This assemblage is dated to about 700-100 b.p. from other sites in the region. Typologically diagnostic items and obsidian hydration data are also the most reliable indicators of this assemblage.

The following sections describe the flaked stone collections by defined components, integrating these into temporally defined assemblages. The objective of these studies is twofold: 1) to characterize temporally discrete flaked stone assemblages in the Skyrocket locality represented by the recovered materials; and 2) to provide robust descriptions of these assemblages useful for constructing models of technological organization (Ericson and Purdy 1984; Kelly 1988; Nelson 1991). Together, these studies should provide the basis for developing a framework for examining aspects of cultural change and adaptation for the human groups occupying the region during the past 9,200 years.

Limitations affecting the success of these objectives include potentially significant mixing of materials within both component 8--the lower soil strata, and components 4-1--the upper soil strata. Components 7-5 within the gravelly clay series--formed by colluvial/erosional events and brief periods of soil development--also failed to yield single component deposits. Reconstruction of flaked stone assemblages within the deep component relies on characteristics of technology and artifact morphology combined with toolstone material differences. Justification for this strategy is provided by information about contemporaneous assemblages throughout the western U.S.; comparison with these assemblages supports inferred differences and enables distinguishing between them. Characterization of flaked stone assemblages from the upper components is more restricted and relies even more so on inter-site comparison. As a consequence, less can be said about the later assemblages at Skyrocket without including information from the surrounding region, and refined reconstructions of past systems of technological organization are not possible; much of the conclusions are restricted to tool forms without the substantiation or clarification obtainable from debitage analysis.

Given the circumstances and scope of the project, certain limitations apply. Obsidian studies do not reflect the true diversity inherent in that assemblage. While Bodie Hills and Casa Diablo glass groups appear to predominate during all time periods, the varying importance or presence of other glasses are not accurately portrayed. Napa Valley, Annadel, Borax Lake, Queen/Truman, Mt. Hicks, and several lesser sources were identified but visual sourcing by macroscopic attributes did not distinguished them in many cases; XRF characterization was applied in selected samples. The absence of this detail is mostly important to the flake analysis as it has a bearing on deciphering differences in technological and economic strategies.

ANALYSIS RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear from the Component 8 data that a full range of activities pertaining to flaked stone acquisition and use occurred. Tools were produced, used at the locality as well as presumably elsewhere, maintained, and replaced. While seasonality of site use can not be determined directly from flaked stone items, tool functions can be ascribed to hunting, butchering, and processing of hard and soft materials. A range of flake tools and drill forms could attest to both vegetal and faunal processing. A high degree of production of flakes from cores could also be assumed to represent the need for frequent replacement of expedient cutting and scraping tools.

Flaked stone evidence from the earliest time period of site use suggests either frequent seasonal visits to the locality for material replacement while subsistence activities also occurred or potentially year-round sustained use of the locality for a comparatively short duration. Given the low proportion of non-local materials ascribed to the formal tool classes of this assemblage, the latter interpretation is favored. This conclusion can be qualified, however, by presuming the inhabitants of the region at this timedepth pursued subsistence activities within a geographically proscribed region where FGS was readily accessible and therefore had little need of supplementing their toolkits with non-local materials.

Three Lake Mojave Series projectile points recovered from the deep clay strata were made from diverse toolstone materials. While these forms are typically ascribed to WPLT assemblages throughout the Desert West, they exhibit some technological and morphological similarity to some of the large stemmed and lanceolate forms made on FGS in this assemblage. Given their material types, however, it is tempting to assign them to the Stanislaus Phase assemblage; the technological characteristics of manufacture and maintenance could be attributed to either group.

Technological organization of the following small dart assemblage population was characterized by attributes indicating a greater degree of mobility. This conclusion is derived from the greater degree of tool maintenance, low numbers of primary forms, morphological diversity, and material variability evident in the flaked stone assemblage. Assuming the majority of non-local materials can be ascribed to this population, settlement relocation in the pursuit of subsistence apparently either brought the group into contact with peoples from the east side of the Sierra Nevada range or marked a high level of transhumance across the crest. Material diversity within the flake tool categories could be assumed to indicate this population also pursued a subsistence strategy entailing a broad variety of regionally dispersed processing activities as well.

Much of Component 7-5 is represented by materials from upper and lower strata of the other components; certain proveniences might be defined by temporally delimited assemblages but data from these were not available for this study. The use of exotic materials increases in this component; CHR and OBS now represent 11% of the debitage sample and 28% of the tools. A significant increase in worked flakes and core/core tools and a decline in the size of these and other tools is coupled with increased flake-to-tool ratios and decreased flake size.

Technological organization of site inhabitants during the last 4,000 years as represented by Component 4-1 is more difficult to define given the amount of mixing of occupational deposits. Again, potential single component areas of this deposit might be identified in the future but more specific data was unavailable for this report. While this time period represents at least four archaeologically defined cultural components, certain generalizations regarding the flaked stone assemblages must be applied.

Overall, debitage materials other than GRS (55%) each account for 7-12% of the recovered sample. This differs from Component 8 where FGS (58%) and GRS (33%) accounted for all but 9% of the sample; individual materials other than these ranged from 1% (CHR) to 4% (QUZ) in that component. Thus, the relative importance of these other materials increases with time. This is reflected in the general decrease in local materials: BAS, GRS, FGS debitage combined dropped to 79% and for tools the proportion declined to 65%.

In fact, this can be seen more dramatically in the proportions of tool types. Obsidian was used for bifaces in this component in 37% of that group. It comprised 33% of Component 7-5's group but only nine percent in Component 8. Obsidian EMFs comprised only 2% of that category in Component 8 but 8% in this component.

CHR comprised 6% of the bifaces and 15% of the unifaces in Component 8 but 17% of the bifaces and only 7% of the unifaces in this component. This reflects both a shift in the use of CHR for bifaces but also a change in the importance of uniface forms, the latter representing a significant attribute of the earliest assemblage. Use of CHR for EMFs drops from 8% in Component 8 to 1% in this component. The number of cores/core tools of CHR increases from three in Component 8 to seven in Component 4-1.

The mean weight for all debitage materials is less in Component 4-1 than it is in Component 8. This also correlates with tool size which evinces a decrease in this component and general increases in flake-to-tool ratios for most materials which is greater than Component 8 but somewhat lower than the previous component.

Among the few well-defined Sierra Phase assemblages in the region which might be useful for comparison is TUO-2192, the Sturgis Site. Situated several miles east of Sonora, this site appeared to be dominated by a Middle Period deposit focused at the North Locus (Waugh and Rondeau 1990). Middle Period diagnostic materials included a few corner-notched forms, a bipoint, a concave base form, a triangular form, nine handstones, two complete millingslabs, a sandstone pipe, and a steatite bead. A pestle, two complete unifaces and one fragment, and a dozen bifaces and fragments were also recovered. Most OBS bifaces were fragments. A milling station indicating a possible Late Period occupation was identified at the South Locus, however, recovery rates there were very low and lacked temporally diagnostic materials. Excluding a few outliers, obsidian hydration for 42 specimens from the North Locus--mostly BH--exhibited a range of 3.7 - 5.5 (mean = 4.5 microns). This data was marked by a limited bimodal distribution characterized by means of 4.3 and 4.8 .

Flaked stone debitage at this site was marked by a recovery rate of 300 items per cubic meter, most of it from the North Locus (93%). Although this figure was closest in value to that defined for Component 4-1 at Skyrocket, OBS rates were higher (265/m 3) and CCR was much lower (22/m 3); the latter at this site, however, comprises local cherts and thus might include a variety of FGS and CHR. Flake-to-tool ratios were 289:1 for OBS, 30:1 for CCR, and 29:1 for other. With the exception of OBS, these figures were much lower than those characterizing Component 4-1. The high ratio exhibited by OBS could be interpreted as the product of a high degree of tool curation.

Situated a few miles east of Sonora, TUO-2642, the Kelley Site contained a pronounced Horseshoe Bend Phase assemblage and a sparsely represented Sierra Phase component (Rondeau 1992). Use during the Redbud Phase and earlier times were minimally indicated. The flaked stone assemblage was defined by 37 DSNs, 34 large points and fragments, 5 drills, 13 cores, 26 formed flake tools, and 75 EMFs (Rondeau 1992). Nearly 38% of the DSNs and 69% of EMFs were made of OBS; this material comprised 29% of debitage.

Debitage recovery rates on 8.83 cubic meters excavated were 621/m 3: OBS was 182/m 3; CCR was 355/m 3; and miscellaneous igneous materials was 7/m 3. Using only formal tools, flake-to-tool ratios for OBS was 20:1; if EMFs are included, this value is 12:1. The higher of these ratios is lower than the value defining the assemblage from Component 4-1 at Skyrocket. For CCR the figure is 62:1, higher than the figure for either FGS or CHR from Component 4-1.

Seventy-seven percent of the OBS submitted for source analysis was BH; the remaining 23% was comprised of Napa Valley (n=4), Casa Diablo (n=4), Queen/Truman (n=3), "Queen Impostor"/Mt. Hicks (n=4), Mono Glass Mtn. (n=1), and non-OBS (n=1). As many as 84% of the entire hydration sample could be BH (Rondeau 1992:50).

CAL-991, Ft. Mountain Rockshelter, was situated about 18 miles north of New Melones Reservoir. Although hydration results and some artifact forms suggest the site contained materials dated to the last 3000 years, most of the deposit was dominated by occupational residues attributed to Phase II Late Period assemblages (White 1988). A total of 6.3m 3 of earth were excavated during the data recovery phase. Based on this figure, debitage recovery rates were determined as 79/m 3 for OBS, 1214/m 3 for CCR, or about 1301/m 3 total. All the OBS flakes were less than half inch in size, 69% were trapped in 3-mm screen; 97% of the CCR was under half inch size (White 1988:47-48). The high recovery rate figure for CCR might be partly accounted for by inclusion of a variety of cherts in the sample, however, an another explanation presented below could also be considered the primary factor.

Flake-to-tool ratios for this site can not take into account component divisions, but most flaked stone materials used in the calculations can be attributed to the Horseshoe Bend Phase. The OBS flake-to-tool ratio (9:1) was in a range compatible with figures for Component 8 at Skyrocket indicating very little debris production relative to tool use. CCR was calculated at 47:1, also relatively low but compatible with the value representing CHR in Component 4-1 at Skyrocket. The exceedingly low value for OBS is best explained as significant differences in site function between this site and Skyrocket and consequent technological organization. Ft. Mountain Rockshelter was characterized by minimal square footage used by about 8-10 people (White 1988). Occupation represented "the colonization of a poor habitat as a consequence of population pressures elsewhere in the region. Small group size, residential mobility, and localized opportunistic subsistence strategy based on marginal foods are taken to be the colonizing population's typical response to the degree of uncertainty and abbreviated carrying capacity of a poor habitat and were contributing factors to occupation of a small, but habitable regress" (White 1988:i). Tool maintenance was spatially concentrated creating a high recovery rate and a similar high discard/loss rate for functionally maintainable items.

Additional Comparison

The variability of uses exhibited by locally obtained materials versus exotic ones characterizes significant differences within and between components. Specifically, local materials (BAS, FGS, GRS) retaining cortex comprised 29% of the debitage sample for these materials in Component 8. The mean weight of these combined items was 13.72g indicating the predominance of large flakes. In contrast, cortical exotic materials (CHR, OBS) comprised only 4% of that sample and were represented by smaller flakes (2.09g) including many pressure flakes but a number of larger flakes compatible with biface thinning and some primary reduction.

Component 7-5 was marked by a lower proportion of cortical material in the local debitage sample (20%) but a higher proportion in the exotic sample (12%); although the latter might indicate an emerging trend, it is probably best explained by the low number of specimens in that sample (n=52). Mean weights indicate a slight increase in size of local cortical materials (16.84g) over Component 8, and a decrease in size of exotic material (0.47g).

Although the proportion of cortical local material remains high in Component 4-1 (21%) the mean weight values indicate a significant reduction in flake size (2.98g) much closer to that represented by OBS in Component 8. Sixteen percent of the exotic materials retained cortex; these yielded a mean weight value of 1.00g. Again, the sample size of the exotic materials (n=31) could be skewing the results.

Thus, cortical local material decreases slightly in proportion relative to the data set but significantly in size. Exotic materials with cortex also exhibit declines in proportion and a decrease in size, but the contrasts are not as extreme. It is concluded the use of local materials is marked by significant differences in technological strategy over time but the role of exotic materials undergoes less demonstrable change, at least as viewed from this perspective with the data at hand. The latter frequently arrive at the site in highly reduced forms retaining little cortex and continue to be treated as conserved resources throughout time.

The greatest overall differences in the use of flaked stone materials through time can be attributed to the emphasis on tool manufacture from local FGS in Component 8. The high proportion of bifaces and unifaces, coupled with the intensive production of these and other tools and the contribution of greater amounts of debitage, much of it of a larger size, has generated greater distinctions between the assemblages. As stated in another portion of the report, changing environmental conditions might have reduced or eliminated access to this material sometime after 7000-8000 years ago. This might in part be a factor in the increasing importance of GRS throughout time, a material characterized by poorer isotropic structure but perhaps greater availability.

Summation

Changing proportions of tool forms and toolstone materials throughout time at the Skyrocket site denotes significant changes in technological organization of the inhabitants. These changes can be linked to adaptations within the paleo-toolkits, changes in site and assemblage functions, and related changes in subsistence strategies. One aspect of these changes, the decrease in the relative importance of FGS, can probably be readily attributed to changes in the local environment brought on by pronounced shifts in regional climatic patterns. Had this local material been available in greater quantities to later inhabitants, it can be assumed it would have played a more important role in the manufacturing activities at the site, probably to the detriment of GRS. Certain functional differences between the uses of these materials briefly touched on above might have emerged in greater detail.

Changes in biface thinning objectives through time might be linked to the abundance of FGS during the period represented by the earliest Component 8 assemblage but is more directly attributable to a significant shift in toolkit functions. Technological and morphological changes in bifaces between the earliest assemblage and later periods is a pattern recognized throughout the western U.S. These differences are attributed to changes in weaponry technology, undoubtedly in part a response to subsistence readaptations.

Additionally, standardized bifacial and unifacial core forms in the early period (56%) give way to smaller non-standardized forms later in time. These shifts presumably reflect changing strategies in technological organization as well. Earlier standardized forms allowed for greater predictability in flake detachment and establish forms suited to intended reduction trajectories for defining essential toolkit elements, e.g., biface knives and large unifacial scrapers.

Later core forms are presumed to reflect an increase in the use of smaller more expedient tools as well as production of smaller formal tools corresponding with increased population sedentism. The latter, of course, corresponded with a new technological development, the bow and arrow. For the past 1500 years, production of projectile points for hunting and weaponry required much smaller pieces of raw material and resulted in much smaller pieces of manufacture debris. Accordingly, the masses of raw material required for the tools used in the pursuit of daily sustenance diminished significantly.

Although the information potential of this site has not been fully realized, it is expected continuing regional investigations in the Sierra Nevada foothills will eventually recognize single component deposits providing the conditions necessary for better defining the flaked stone assemblages of mid-Holocene and later occupations. It is only through the study of these temporally delimited assemblages that any major advances in understanding the technological organization of individual cultural units will be achieved. Although the present study has been hindered by an inadequate degree of temporal resolution, the general patterns of change demonstrated will hopefully contribute to research objectives of others working in the region.



References

Beck, Charlotte and George T. Jones
1988 Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition Occupation in Butte Valley, Eastern Nevada.
In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Butler, B. Robert
1965 Contributions to the Archaeology of Southeastern Idaho.
Tebiwa 8:41. Pocatello.

1967 More Haskett Point Finds from the Type Locality. Tebiwa 10:41. Pocatello.

Campbell, E. W. C., W. H. Campbell, E. Antevs, C. A. Amsden, J. A. Barbieri, and F. D. Bode
1937 The Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mojave: A Symposium. Southwest Museum Papers 11. Los Angeles.

Carlson, Roy L.
1988 The View from the North. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Daugherty, Richard D.
1956 The Archaeology of the Lind Coulee Site, Washington. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 100(3):223-278.

Dibble, Harold
1995 Middle Paleolithic Scraper Reduction: Background, Clarification, and Review of the Evidence to Date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2(4):299-368.

Ericson, J.E. and B.A. Purdy
1984 Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Procurement.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Fagan, John L.
1988 Clovis and Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition Lithic Technologies at the Dietz Site in South-central Oregon. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Fredrickson, David A.
1973 Early Cultures of the North Coast Ranges, California. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. U.C. Davis: Department of Anthropology, University of California.

Gramly, Richard M.
1993 The Richey Clovis Cache: Earliest Americans Along the Columbia River. Persimmon Press Monographs in Archaeology.

Hutchinson, Phillip W.
1988 The Prehistoric Dwellers at Lake Hubbs. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Kelly, Robert L.
1988 The Three Sides of a Biface. American Antiquity, 53(4):717-734.

Layton, Thomas N.
1970 High Rock Archaeology. An Interpretation of the Prehistory of the Northwestern Great Basin. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

1979 Archaeology and Paleo-Ecology of Pluvial Lake Parman, Northwestern Great Basin. Journal of New World Archaeology 3(3):41-56.

Moratto, Michael J.
in press Culture History of the New Melones Reservoir Area, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, California. Ms. for proposed Fenenga Memorial Volume.

Nelson, Margaret C.
1991 The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 3. M.B. Schiffer, editor. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

Parry, William J. and Robert L. Kelly
1987 Expedient Core Technology and Sedentism. In, The Organization of Core Technology. J.K. Johnson and C.A. Morrow, eds. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado.

Price, Barry A. and Sarah E. Johnston
1988 A Model of Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Adaptation in Eastern Nevada. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Rondeau, Michael F.
1992 The Archaeology of the Kelley Site: A Phase II Report for the Archaeological Excavation of CA-TUO-2642, for the East Sonora Bypass Project, Tuolumne County, California. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento.

Rondeau, Michael F. and Vicki L. Rondeau
1990 Preliminary Findings: Report on the Analysis of Flaked Stone from the West Locus of CA-CAL-629/630, Calaveras County, California.

1991 Preliminary Findings: Report on the Analysis of Flaked Stone from the Northeast Locus of CA-CAL-629/630, Calaveras County, California.

Singleton, William L.
1986 Flaked Stone Tools. In, Archaeological Investigations, 1968-1980, at 65 Indian Activity Sites near the Stanislaus River, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, California. Michael J. Moratto and William L. Singleton, eds. INFOTEC Development, Inc., Sonora, CA.

Stanford, Dennis J. and Michael A. Jodry
1988 The Drake Clovis Cache. Current Research in the Pleistocene 5:21-22.

Tuohy, Donald R.
1988 Paleoindian and Early Archaic Cultural Complexes from Three Nevada Localities. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Warren, Claude and Robert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory of the Southwestern Area.
In, Handbook of North American Indians. Vol 11. Warren L. d'Azevedo, editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Waugh, Georgie and Michael F. Rondeau
1990 Phase II Test Evaluation Report for Archaeological Sites CA-TUO-2192, CA-TUO-2194, CA-TUO-2349 on State Route 108, for the East Sonora Bypass Project, Tuolumne County, California. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento.

White, Greg
1988 Archaeological Investigations at Fort Mountain Rockshelter (CA-CAL-991), A Late Prehistoric Habitation Site in Central Calaveras County, California. Submitted to USDI Bureau of Land Management, Sacramento, California.

Wilke, Philip J., J. Jeffrey Flenniken, and Terry L. Ozbun
1991 Clovis Technology at the Anzick Site, Montana.
Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 13(2):242-272.

Willig, Judith A., C.Melvin Aikens
1988 The Clovis-Archaic Interface in Far Western North America. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.

Woods, John C. and Gene L. Titmus
1985 A Review of the Simon Clovis Collection. Idaho Archaeologist 8(1):3-8.

Zancanella, John K.
1988 Early Lowland Prehistory in Southcentral Nevada. In, Early Human Occupation in Far Western North America: The Clovis-Archaic Interface. Willig, J.A., C.M. Aikens, and J.L. Fagan, eds. Nevada State Museum, Anthropological Papers, No. 21. Carson City.



Return to Skyrocket Intro Page

Go to Archaeological Studies Page

Go to Home Page

 

Download executable PDF file:
Skyrocket Flaked Stone Analysis report