Top / Cal Courses, Announcements / EA105 / Joint Essay Set

 

JES06 & JES06R — PCS 02: writing premodern-to-modern comparison then responding to your partner's PCS

WORKING SEPARATELY BUT EXCHANGING IDEAS

General comments

I am interested in how viable premodern values are not for the reason many might think (as an answer to the question: "How is the process of modernization going for X country?") but rather to explore issues of identity (how do countries maintain distinct, meaningful identities in an age of global economies and the internet?) and because I believe the in some subterranean way traces of premodern worldviews continue to create differences of interpretation (this is why we discuss context as influencing interpretation) and that these differences are NOT self-apparent and hobble one's understanding of a culture until one can see some of how these very old ways of thinking and old ways of predicting human behavior (= "values", what people are expected to do) can make for important (small or huge) differences.

This exercise gives you the opportunity to try to find links with the past, or understand the position of your film with the past.

However, in addition, this exercise introduces the very difficult film-to-film comparison process. The next exercise (JES07) takes this farther and your ICE is supposed to be the supreme statement on it, although that will be mediated with the final joint statement. Film-to-film comparisons fall quickly into superficial observations if you don't stick to your guns and look deep into the values and worldviews that help create and constraint their narratives.

How to complete the JES06 & JES06R steps

Use the same sending / exchanging process that is described in JES05 & JES05R.

Here is the Form-JES06.

 

>>>> DEFINITIONS

academically credible: Resources and assertions that meet the basic standards of good academic quality. More ...

access (to films): Students must have easy and repeatable access to their films throughout the term; I also have various access requirements. More ...

blind: Partners working separately or, if conversing about something, not leading the other into an interpretation or characterization. More ...

compare: Usually this means finding subtle differences relevant to the class and core values. More ...

compound statements: Avoid compound statements. More ...

content / content rich: Avoid topical descriptions, give me specific content. More ...

deducing values & worldviews: Thinking of how the narrative at the level of story "treats" a character's choices, and thinking of how the narrative presents a character's choices are good starts. More ...

E. A. Countries: Japan, Korea and China. More ...

film title management: The basic citation in all cases except the bibliography follows this pattern: Three Times (Taiwan, 2005). For the complicated bibliographic citation, specific to this course, go here; More ...

film summary: 300-500 words with specific requirements, graded lightly at first then carefully at the ICE stage. More ...

FJS: Final Joint Segment. More ...

ICE: Individual Comparative Essay. More ...

instance: "Instance" is any text, film, passage, scene or other sort of moment that has become the object of analysis and is situated in a very specific time & place. More ...

JES: Joint Essay Set. This is the umbrella term for the entire essay project in its many steps. The name is meant to emphasize the team-based, dialogic nature of the assignment.

meeting details: These details are important, graded carefully and must be content-rich. More ...

NDT: Narrowly Defined Topic. This is the mutual decided topic for the individual essays. More ...

overreach: Conclusions or even speculations that are broader than is warranted. More ...

PCS: Preliminary Comparative Statement. "Preliminary" means "ahead of writing your ICE".

relate: An analytic method that asks you to speculate in one, some or all of these three basic spectrums: presence/absence, degree of modification, acceptance/resistance. More ...

romance: My working definition of "romance" for this class. More ...

story / story's world: We cannot deduce a text's or film's values based solely on narrative events; it is necessary to think about how those events are presented. More ...

term slippage: A messy exploration of an idea, or a sly rhetorical move when done on purpose. More ...

values / worldview: For this class, worldviews and values both contribute to context and help us understand cultural differences. Worldviews are primarily metaphysical; values are similar to social norms. More ...