Top / Cal Courses, Announcements / EA105 Summer 2012 / Joint Essay Set

 

JES Top Page

General instructions for every step. Please review the below before each step submission.

You are, in general, working in a less forgiving environment than usual because partners share grades and I am very concerned about one team member pulling down the grade of another. Be on time and follow instructions. "Oops!" doesn't work in this environment. Get it right the first time.

On time submission. Very important. Severe penalties.

The JES process is not a typical paper-writing process. All instructions exist for a reason. Even if you cannot see that reason please follow them.

The JES process includes stages where you work with your partner and important stages when you do not. Do NOT interpret or analyze your films in detail with one another when selecting films, topics, or such. (Of course you can communicate about the mechanics of meeting and such, or worries about instructions, but not the content of your thoughts on the films.) The whole point is to have different perspectives. You will find that you cannot score well on JES submissions if you have over-talked your interpretations of a film before the appropriate time in the process.

All email correspondence copies me and your partner. Please ALWAYS DO THIS—except where I specifically tell you not to contact your partner.

Reasoning behind this, if you are curious:

  • Why you copy your partner when writing me. Since grades are shared on some submissions, copying your partner when submitting to me allows your partner to confirm that you completed the assignment correctly and on time (since your partner will share your late submission penalty) and can check the contents to confirm as well that those contents match his/her description of the meeting or whatever (since your partner will share the grade on the quality of the submission).
  • Why you copy me when writing your partner. I observe the exchanges to monitor the health of the team, to step in if there was an error that will cause trouble for you, and so on. There are a lot of reasons.

All email correspondence to me, and hopefully to each other, maintains the following subject line pattern for JES work even when it is not a submission:

EA105_assignmenttag_LASTNAME_classname

It might improve your score.

Examples:

EA105_JES05_09B_CHENEY_Lisa

EA105_JES02R_09B_CHENEY_Lisa

EA105_JES06_20A_HWANG_Joe

Attach the form when requested to attach the form / paste into email when requested to paste into email. Please don't mix these up.

You will receive an ACCEPTED or NOT YET ACCEPTED email from me. Watch for this so that you can resubmit quickly if your submission was not accepted.

Read the instructions for the step before submitting, please! I don't have time for resubmission requests.

Jump to Step Instructions

The jump links are inconveniently located here, in my hope that you will review the above instructions before each step :-)

>>>> DEFINITIONS

academically credible: Resources and assertions that meet the basic standards of good academic quality. More ...

access (to films): Students must have easy and repeatable access to their films throughout the term; I also have various access requirements. More ...

blind: Partners working separately or, if conversing about something, not leading the other into an interpretation or characterization. More ...

compare: Usually this means finding subtle differences relevant to the class and core values. More ...

compound statements: Avoid compound statements. More ...

content / content rich: Avoid topical descriptions, give me specific content. More ...

deducing values & worldviews: Thinking of how the narrative at the level of story "treats" a character's choices, and thinking of how the narrative presents a character's choices are good starts. More ...

E. A. Countries: Japan, Korea and China. More ...

film title management: The basic citation in all cases except the bibliography follows this pattern: Three Times (Taiwan, 2005). For the complicated bibliographic citation, specific to this course, go here; More ...

film summary: 300-500 words with specific requirements, graded lightly at first then carefully at the ICE stage. More ...

FJS: Final Joint Segment. More ...

ICE: Individual Comparative Essay. More ...

instance: "Instance" is any text, film, passage, scene or other sort of moment that has become the object of analysis and is situated in a very specific time & place. More ...

JES: Joint Essay Set. This is the umbrella term for the entire essay project in its many steps. The name is meant to emphasize the team-based, dialogic nature of the assignment.

meeting details: These details are important, graded carefully and must be content-rich. More ...

NDT: Narrowly Defined Topic. This is the mutual decided topic for the individual essays. More ...

overreach: Conclusions or even speculations that are broader than is warranted. More ...

PCS: Preliminary Comparative Statement. "Preliminary" means "ahead of writing your ICE".

relate: An analytic method that asks you to speculate in one, some or all of these three basic spectrums: presence/absence, degree of modification, acceptance/resistance. More ...

romance: My working definition of "romance" for this class. More ...

story / story's world: We cannot deduce a text's or film's values based solely on narrative events; it is necessary to think about how those events are presented. More ...

term slippage: A messy exploration of an idea, or a sly rhetorical move when done on purpose. More ...

values / worldview: For this class, worldviews and values both contribute to context and help us understand cultural differences. Worldviews are primarily metaphysical; values are similar to social norms. More ...