BACK TO ourHealdsburg.com      BACK to  NOISE page

Developing a new Healdsburg Noise Ordinance

 

Current Noise Regulations in the Healdsburg Zoning Ordinance

On November 5, the Healdsburg Planning Department released the first DRAFT of the proposed new Noise Ordinance. Review it [here]

 This symbol   indicates ourHealdsburg.com comment.

Related Links

OurHealdsburg.com Noise Glossary

Examples of other City Noise Ordinances

The next links are large PDF files. Have patience.

Complete Healdsburg Zoning Ordinance (PDF)

Healdsburg Zoning map (PDF)

The  Zoning Map and Ordinance are  in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). 

Version 5.0 Adobe Acrobat Reader is available for free download here: 

  

[ Healdsburg does not have a distinct and separate "Noise Ordinance". What we have is a patchwork of references to noise and various kinds of noise "regulation". Painfully clear is all the tinkering and politics that went into creating this mess.

 

[ The first ten sections outline the Healdsburg Zoning Regulation objectives. The General Provisions section, Part 4, gets to specific application of the noise regulations. The actual "Noise Standard" is found at Section 2130.]

Some general observations: we should have a consistent noise regulations for all Healdsburg. 

For example: Where do you measure the sound level? For some noise sources it seems practical to measure at the offending (noise generating) property line to prevent general noise pollution and additional contribution to the ambient noise level. The reality is the noise generated at a property line may be within the noise limits for that Zone. Our problems occur when the noise crosses from one zone to a zone with a lower sound level limit.

So what the "Sensitive Receptor" really cares about is the sound level at the "Receiving property line".

For a practical noise enforcement, both types of measurements are required!

Our current noise regulations give us a grab-bag of measurement location options. Section 2130, clearly states sound level measurements are to be made at the receiving property line, yet throughout the regulations we state all kinds of alternative methods:   "within 5 feet of the property line" "the boundaries of the lot", "at the property line", "outside of the facility on the adjacent public sidewalk/street",  "on the property line of the property receiving the noise",  "at a distance of twenty-five (25) feet", "outside the structure at a distance as close to 25 feet from the equipment", and "outside of the property plane of the project".

 

Another example of inconsistency is the introduction of a different methods for noise measurement such as "slow response A weighting", continuous sound level or repetitive peak,  average dBA, and Ldn in different sections.]

Healdsburg Zoning Ordinance, October 15, 2001

Noise Regulation Excerpts

INDEX

 

Article 1- Purpose and Intent

Article 2- Agriculture District (AG)

Article 3- One-Family Dwelling Districts (R-1)

Article 4- Multi-Family Dwelling District (RM)

Article 5- Downtown Residential District (DRD)

Article 6- Office Districts

Article 7- Commercial Districts

Article 8- Industrial Districts

Article 9- Public (P) District

Article 10- Residential Master Plan (RMP) District

Part 4: General Provisions

Article 18- General Provisions

Sec. 1805 General yard requirements

Sec. 1820 Accessory structures

Sec. 1840 Home occupation requirements

Sec. 1885 General provisions relating to telecommunication facilities

Sec. 1890 Residential visitor lodging requirements

Sec. 18130 Alcoholic Beverage Establishments

Sec. 2130 Noise Standards

c) Special provisions

 

Article 1-

Purpose and Intent  

Sec. 100 Objectives of the Zoning Ordinance

This zoning ordinance has been adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the community and to implement policies contained in the Healdsburg General Plan and any specific plans adopted pursuant to the General Plan. More specifically, the zoning ordinance is intended to:

(e) Reduce the risk of injury or exposure to hazards for people and property.

(j) Provide for the gradual elimination of land uses and structures that are inconsistent with the policies of the General Plan and which may adversely affect other property or uses.

(n) Provide protection from excessive, unnecessary and unreasonable noise for all residents from any and all sources within the community.

[ What is the definition of excessive, unnecessary, or unreasonable? This is why we need a new noise ordinance, to define these terms in both a technical and logical manner!]

(o) To control the adverse effect of noise on the community.

[ After a stumbling start, we now declare noise to have an adverse effect! We agree!]

Sec. 115 Definitions

[ This section is totally inadequate. As you read through the current Healdsburg noise regulations below you will find many undefined terms and technical references.] 

For purposes of this ordinance, certain words and terms used herein are defined in the following manner.

Local ambient noise. The lowest sound level repeating itself during a six minute period as measured with a precision sound level meter, using slow response and "A" weighting. The minimum sound level meter shall be determined with the noise source at issue silent, and in the same location as the measurement of the noise level of the source or sources at issue. If a significant portion of the local ambient noise is produced by one or more individually identifiable sources which would otherwise be operating continuously during the six minute period and contributing significantly to the ambient sound level, determination of the local ambient noise level shall be accomplished with these separate identifiable noise silent.

[ "The lowest sound level repeating itself during a six minute period..." I have no idea what this means. This definition is used in other municipal codes in California. It appears to have been written many years ago when Sound Level Meters could only measure "peak" events and not measure and average over a longer time period.  Even if we knew what this "lowest sound level" was, this definition is very difficult to enforce in real life. It requires that both the noise source and the ambient source be measured from the same location, and that the "noise source" and any other noise sources "contributing significantly to the ambient sound level" be silent in order to determine the ambient noise. Good Luck! Once again we also create additional definition and enforcement problems by not defining "significantly".

Newer, widely used definitions of ambient sound level, or background noise, are based on a sound level average, typically the One Hour Ninetieth Percentile Sound Level (L90). This is the noise level in an area that is exceeded 90% of the time over one hour. Averaging over 24 hours would give an over-estimate of the ambient noise at night-time and an under-estimate of it during the day.  An alternative, and "official" ambient sound level measurement standard is provided in American National Standard Method for the Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels"  S 1.13-1971 (R1986).]

Noise level. The maximum continuous sound level or repetitive peak level produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a precision sound level meter using the "A" weighting scale, and the meter response function to "slow."

Precision sound level meter. A device for measuring sound level in decibel units within the performance specifications contained in the American National Standards Institute Standards S1.4. "Specification for Sound Level Meters," or the most recent revision.

Property plane. A vertical plane, including the property line, which determines the property boundaries in space.

Sound level. As expressed in decibels, dB, a logarithmic indication of the ratio between the acoustic energy present at a given location and the lowest amount of acoustic energy audible to sensitive human ears and weighted by frequency to account for characteristics of human hearing, as given in the American National Standards Institute Standard S1.1, "Acoustic Technology," paragraph 2.9, or successor reference. All references to dB in this chapter utilize the A-weighting scale, abbreviated dBA, measured as set forth in this ordinance.

[ The four definitions above are standard definitions found word-for-word in other city ordinances.]


Article 2- Agriculture District (AG)

No specific noise requirements.

[ Admitted, the Agriculture District in Healdsburg is small and on the West side of the freeway, but nevertheless they are within the city limits. No reason to exempt them from noise pollution.]

Article 3- One-Family Dwelling Districts (R-1)

Sec. 300 Purposes

In addition to the objectives contained in Sec. 100 of this ordinance, the R-1 districts are established to achieve the following purposes:

(g) To protect residential properties from the hazards, noise, and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic.

[ Finally, the single family dwelling residential District zone. What do the Zoning regulations say about controlling noise pollution here? Subsection (g) only wants to protect us from the, noise created by "commercial and industrial traffic." Very perplexing, no mention of any other kind of noise source. How can that be?]

 

(h) To protect residential properties from noise, illumination, unsightliness, odors, dust, dirt, smoke, vibration, heat, glare, and other objectionable influences.

[ This is it. Our zoning objectives do care about our residential areas! We want to protect residential properties (and we hope the people residing inside) from NOISE POLLUTION! There it is with all the other pollution, or as the ordinance calls it, "objectionable influences". To be fair the Zoning Ordinance, Section 100,(e) states a primary objective is to "Reduce the risk of injury or exposure to hazards for people and property."]

Article 4- Multi-Family Dwelling District (RM)

Sec. 400 Purposes

(g) To protect residential properties from the hazards, noise, and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic.

(h) To protect residential properties from noise, illumination, unsightliness, odors, dust, dirt, smoke, vibration, heat, glare, and other objectionable influences.

[ Multi-Family dwellings have the same zoning ordinance protection objectives as the R-1 single family dwelling residential District above.]

 

Article 5- Downtown Residential District (DRD)

No specific noise requirements.

[ Anybody have a guess why the Downtown residents don't need to be  protected from noise pollution, like the other residential districts? After all, we protect commercial properties from noise, see Section 700 below.]

Article 6- Office Districts

Sec. 600 Purposes ORM (Office and Multiple Family Residential District)

In addition to the objectives prescribed in Sec. 100 of this ordinance, the ORM, office and multi-family residential district is included in the zoning ordinance to achieve the following purposes:

(f) To protect offices and multi-family dwellings from the noise, disturbance, traffic hazards, safety hazards, and other objectionable influences incidental to commercial uses.

[ It looks like you are better off living in the ORM District where the zoning regulation objective is to protect the offices and multi-family dwellings. (Once again people don't seem to need protection, just the property.)

Article 7- Commercial Districts

Sec. 700 Purposes

In addition to the objectives prescribed in Sec. 100, commercial districts are included in the zoning ordinance to achieve the following purposes:

(f) To protect commercial properties from noise, odor, dust, dirt, smoke, vibration, heat, glare, heavy truck traffic, and other objectionable influences incidental to adjacent industrial areas.

[ Here the objective is to protect commercial properties from adjacent industrial areas. Interesting, for some reason there are no objectives in the Residential districts to protect them from adjacent industrial or commercial area noises, with the exception of commercial and industrial traffic! (See Section 300 above.)

Article 8- Industrial Districts

Sec. 800 Purposes

In addition to the objectives prescribed in Sec. 100, the following purposes are set forth for the establishment of industrial zoning districts:

 

(c) To protect residential and commercial properties and to protect nuisance-free,

Non-hazardous industrial uses from noise, odor, insect nuisance, dust, dirt, smoke, vibration, heat, cold, glare, truck and rail traffic, and from other objectionable influences, and from fire, explosion, noxious fumes, radiation, and other hazards incidental to certain industrial uses.

 

[ I keep rereading subsection (c) trying to understand what is intended. So lets parse this Section together:

The first paragraph tells us Section 100 contains the the primary set of zoning objectives. Section 800,(c) also adds the objective "to protect residential and commercial properties" (does this mean only those in Section 700 - Commercial Districts, or all commercial properties in any Zone?)

Section 800(c) goes on: "and to protect nuisance-free (what does this mean?) Non-hazardous industrial uses  from noise, ..."truck and rail traffic"... (two other significant noise sources, but curiously we don't mention truck and rail traffic in residential zones.).....

I don't have a clue what is intended in this paragraph, except we don't care at all about protecting HAZARDOUS industrial uses.] 

[ I don't get it. Our current Zoning regulations have no Zoning objectives regarding noise pollution impacts to our Libraries, Schools, Parks, Cemetery, Golf Course, or Beach. This oversight includes Community Centers or Senior Centers located within these areas.]

[ Want to know what our noise pollution objectives are for our citizens dwelling in the RMP District? None! Compare RMP with the RM District (Sec. 400 above.) You do know where the two RMP Districts are, don't you? One next to the freeway, the other next to Badger Park. Nice way to treat our Low Income and Senior Citizens!]

Sec. 1805 General yard requirements

(h) Depth adjoining a freeway or railroad. No lot backing onto a freeway or railroad right-of-way shall have a depth of less than one hundred and thirty (130) feet, unless adequate alternative noise mitigation is provided, as approved by the Planning Director.

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances.  What is adequate? What is "alternative noise mitigation"? Is 130 feet an adequate alternative to some other mitigation?  Shouldn't we have a measurable sound level limit? Perhaps it should be the maximum sound level that is permitted for that zone?]

Sec. 1820 Accessory structures

(c) No accessory structure used for human habitation, and no swimming pool, or structure containing machinery or other fixed equipment capable of creating noise audible outside of the structure shall be located closer than 5 feet to a side or rear property line.

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances.  If the machinery or other fixed equipment is capable of creating noise audible outside of the structure - what difference does 5 feet make?  Shouldn't we have a measurable sound level limit at the property line? Perhaps it should be the maximum sound level that is permitted for that zone?]

Sec. 1840 Home occupation requirements

(f) A home occupation shall not create any radio waves, television interference or similar electronic interference on adjacent properties. Noise audible beyond the boundaries of the lot shall not be created.

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances. No Noise is permitted when audible beyond the boundaries of the lot! This sets a new standard for noise in Healdsburg.  Shouldn't we have a measurable sound level limit at the property line? Perhaps it should be the maximum sound level that is permitted for that zone?]

Sec. 1885 General provisions relating to telecommunication facilities

(s) Telecommunications - Noise and traffic.

All telecommunication facilities shall be constructed and operated in such a manner as to minimize the amount of disruption caused to nearby properties. To that end all the following measures shall be implemented:

(1) Outdoor noise producing construction activities shall only take place on weekdays (Monday through Friday) between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. unless allowed at other times by the Planning Commission;

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances. Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m.? This is good!. Lets extend these hours to all Construction and Industrial sites in Healdsburg.]

(2) Backup generators shall only be operated during power outages and for testing and maintenance purposes. Noise attenuation measures shall be included to reduce noise levels to an exterior noise level of at least a Ldn of 60 dB at the property line and an interior noise level of a Ldn of 45 dB. Testing and maintenance shall only take place on weekdays between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.; and

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances. Section 1885, all 14 pages,  is unbelievable overkill for one zoning land use type. This section hastily inserted into the Healdsburg Zoning Ordinance during the telecommunications craziness of the last decade, was obviously a "cut and paste" project. The entire Section 1885 was cut from some other source and pasted into the Healdsburg Zoning Ordinance. An example of the results: the last sentence in Sec. 1885,(s),(2) above is incomplete leaving the word "and" dangling at the end.

This careless "cut and paste" technique also thoughtlessly introduces an entirely new sound measurement concept into the Healdsburg noise regulations, the Ldn (daynight average level) measurement.  This is the only place in the Healdsburg noise regulations where this measurement is used, and of course it isn't defined!

Also introduced to the ordinance is the inside sound level measurement, or "interior noise level". Of course we could have just used an "Indoor" level in the sound level table below.  ]

Sec. 1890 Residential visitor lodging requirements

The following standards shall apply to residential visitor lodging operations:

The following regulations shall apply to any special event permit located within a residential visitor lodging dwelling:

(1) Amplified music or speech activity shall be in compliance with the noise regulations as set forth in Section 2130.

(2) No event shall last longer than one day and shall be limited to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Any activities on the sites shall be in compliance with the noise regulations as set forth in Section 2130.

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances. Why do we need a paragraph (1) when paragraph (2) states "Any activities on the sites (site?) shall be in compliance with the noise regulations....? OK, why do we need paragraph (2)? If we have a noise regulation applicable to the zone where the Residential visitor lodging is located, why is it necessary to add additional references?]

Sec. 18130 Alcoholic Beverage Establishments

(h) Non conforming uses

(1) Any commercial establishment which was engaged in the sale of alcoholic beverages where the business was in existence and lawfully operating before the effective date of this ordinance is herein after considered to be a legal nonconforming use. The City Council may, pursuant to the provisions of Article 23 of this Ordinance, at any time, require that a particular legal nonconforming business engaged in the sale of alcoholic beverages obtain a conditional use permit if it determines that such business is being operated in such a manner that it creates a nuisance to surrounding uses. A nuisance shall exist if and when an existing alcoholic beverage establishment operates in such a manner in the judgment of the City Council, so that any of the following regularly occurs: generation of excessive noise, inadequate crowd control, generation of excessive litter, inadequate parking facilities, excessive calls for police service, or existence of unsafe conditions as determined by the Building Official or the Fire Chief.

v. The alcoholic beverage establishment shall be operated in such a manner so that it at no time violates zoning standards regarding noise generation. The applicant shall present a Noise Management Plan to the Planning Director prior to the commencement of the use. Said plan shall establish the method by which noise impacts, including but not limited to, amplified music and patron noise from within the facility as well as patrons/pedestrians outside of the facility on the adjacent public sidewalk/street will be regulated to avoid disruption to the immediate neighborhood. Should complaints be received regarding noise disruption, the applicant shall take reasonable and practical steps as directed by the Planning Director to reduce the intensity, number and/or occurrences of these disruptions. Said steps may include, but are not limited to, the reduction of the number and/or volume of microphones, amplifiers and speakers; the installation of certain physical improvements designed to attenuate noise generation; the relocation of patron waiting/queuing areas to a location found to be acceptable to the Planning Director; and/or the reduction in hours for the commercial recreation activities. The Planning Director may require the preparation of an acoustical evaluation to quantify the noise levels and to suggest appropriate attenuation measures. Such an evaluation shall be funded by the applicant and directed by the Planning Director to be performed with no notice to owner/operator.

xi. The applicant shall, for the first 6 months, schedule a monthly meeting with the Planning Director and Chief of Police in order to identify and mitigate any noise/parking/lighting problems and/or neighborhood concerns.

xiii. A conditional use permit for an alcoholic beverage establishment may be recalled to the Planning Commission for review at any time at a public hearing due to complaints regarding lack of compliance with conditions of approval, traffic congestion, noise generation, or other adverse operating characteristics. At such time, the Commission may revoke the conditional use permit or add/modify conditions of approval.

[ Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions and variances. So what is "excessive noise"? What sound level on the Sound Level Meter is excessive? If we are to believe what is said in paragraph (v.), then "excessive noise" is ANY noise exceeding the noise standard for the zone where the establishment is located. (See Table 25 below.) 

Sec. 2130 Noise Standards

The following standards shall be applied to control excessive noise in the community.

(a) No person shall produce, suffer, or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or any combination of same on a property, a noise level more than the noise level standard established for the land use designations in subsection (b) on the property line of the property receiving the noise.

(b) The following noise level standards shall be applied in the City of Healdsburg:

Table 25. Noise standards by land use

[ How loud is 65 dB? These sound levels are too high!  These noise limits are worst case urban noise levels, much too high for rural Healdsburg!]

Land Use

Average dBA

outdoor

indoor

Residential

65 day

55 night

45 day

35 night

Commercial

65 day

55 night

45 day

40 night

Industrial

80 day

55 night

50 day

45 night

Office

65 day

55 night

45 day

40 night

Parks & Recreation

65 day

55 night

-

-

Notes:

1. Day shall mean between the hours of  7 a.m. and 10 p.m.

2. Night shall mean between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

[The noise originating in Commercial and Industrial (80db(A)) zones should have realistic standard work hour limits, M-F, 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. to protect adjacent residential areas. This is already a Healdsburg standard, see Section 1885.

 

Residential areas are really occupied 24-7.  Many people including the elderly, retired, pre-school children, and moms, are "stay at home" all day residents.   Some people actually go to bed before 10 p.m.]

(c) Special provisions

The following special provisions shall apply to the creation of excessive noise.

[ Nowhere in these regulations is the word "excessive" defined.] 

(1) Any noise source which does not produce a noise level exceeding 70 dBA at a distance of twenty-five (25) feet under the most noisy condition of the use shall be exempt from the provisions of Sections 2130 (a), (b), and (c) between the hours of 7 A.M. and 5 P.M. daily, except Sundays and holidays.

[ Now this is cute! How loud is 70 dB? ANY NOISE 70dB(A) or less, when measured at 25 feet is exempt from ALL NOISE STANDARDS, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, except Sundays and holidays!  This includes indoors as well as outdoors!  Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions, and variances.

(2) Aural warning devices which are required by law to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community shall not produce a noise level more than 3 dB above the standard or minimum level stipulated by law.

[ City law, State law, Federal law? Do we mean Regulations instead of Law? Which is it, "standard" or "minimum"?]

(3) Emergencies are exempt from this article.

[ Emergency is defined in the general zoning ordinance as: "Essential activities necessary to restore, preserve, protect or save lives or property from imminent danger of loss or harm." Difficult to find fault in that.

(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, between the hours of 7:30 A.M. and 6 P.M. daily and not on Sundays and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities which are authorized by a valid City permit shall be allowed if they meet at least one of the following noise limitations:

i. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding

80 dBA at a distance of 25 feet. If the device is housed within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made outside the structure at a distance as close to 25 feet from the equipment as possible.

ii. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed 86 dBA.

[Loopholes, exemptions, exceptions, and variances. 86 dB(A) in any Zone, Commercial and Residential, 6 days each week, 10 1/2 hours per day!  How loud is 86 dB? ]

(d) If the applicant can demonstrate to the Planning Director that a diligent investigation of available noise abatement techniques indicates that immediate compliance with the requirements of this section would be impractical or unreasonable, a permit to allow exceptions from the provisions contained in all or a portion of this article may be issued, with appropriate conditions to minimize the public detriment caused by such exceptions. Any such permit shall be of as short a duration as possible up to six months, but renewable upon a showing of good cause, and shall be conditioned by a schedule for compliance and details of methods therefore in appropriate cases. Any person aggrieved with the decision of the Planning Commission or its designee may appeal to the City Council.

[ Sec. 2130 (d) - The 500 pound gorilla Loophole. Just make so much noise that you can't control it (or if it is "impractical or unreasonable" to control)( two more undefined words), Bingo!-you have a renewable six month exemption! Anybody want to object? Take it to the City Council!]

(e) Upon receipt of a complaint claiming that the noise standards outlined above have been violated, the Planning Director shall cause an investigation of noise conditions to be completed. The Planning Director may retain the services of a professional, registered acoustical engineer to perform noise measurements in accord with the standard set forth in this section. If it is determined and documented that violations of noise standards have occurred, the Planning Director shall refer the entire matter to the City Attorney for action. The individual, firm, association or party found to have caused the excessive noise to occur shall bear all expenses of the acoustical engineer charged to the City in the investigation of the incident.

[Sec. 2130 (e) - This is the entire enforcement provision in this set of noise regulations. We have the the 500 pound gorilla above, and the Toy Poodle and his buddy the Chihuahua nipping at his ankles. No resolution promised. Total time from complaint to questionable relief - six months to a year. Worst thing that can happen to the noise polluter - he gets a relatively small bill for the acoustical engineer's time.]

EXAMPLES OF OTHER CITY NOISE ORDINANCES

Boston, Mass.

Davis, California

East Bay Cities Noise Standards, Oakland, Alameda, Berkeley, Albany

Los Altos, California

North Vancouver, BC

San Rafael, CA General Plan Noise element

National Noise Clearinghouse list of City Links

 

BACK TO ourHealdsburg.com      BACK to  NOISE page

webmaster:   thomasjoad@ourHealdsburg.com

© 2002 ourHealdsburg.com™. All rights reserved.