This one day segment of the course introduces the course's framework, policies and areas of emphasis.
About this segment: Soto-uchi ("outside-inside") is a basic, general rubric that helps in reading and understanding premodern Japanese literature and culture. As I treat it, it includes purity, conformity, groupness, exile (or fear of it), public-private in poetry and other areas, and "performance" (omote-ura). It is also the foundation for the next interpretive rubric: form-content (kotoba-kokoro) and helps understand the heavy presence of lyricism in Japanese literature, another of our topics. It is not based on Confucianism or Buddhism. It might be a confluence of social practices that emphasized tribes, Daoist ideas of yin-yang, and Confucian emphasis on family, but this is purely speculative on my part. It is, regardless of origin, deep-seated and fundamental, or at least a modern, academic rubric that helps get at something that is deep-seated and fundamental. This is commonly called "uchi-soto" but I have switched the terms to maintain a parallel for all of them, that is, placing the "outside" first, then the "inside". This regularizes the phrases, and encodes the idea that "outside" comes first, in some ways.
✓ ❖ Shinto comments by Kasulis
✓ ❖ Norito Great Purification at Sixth Month's End
✓ ❖ Kojiki I.1-6 Creation myth
✓ ❖ Kojiki I.16 Susano-o rages
✓ Kojiki II.81 YamatoTakeru
✓ Kojiki II.106 Ame-no-pi-poko crosses from Korea
✓ Reading the Kojiki
✓ Soto-uchi inner spaces and purity
✓ Aoki Shigeru and Kojiki
✓ ❖ Shinto comments by Kasulis
✓ ❖ Izumi Shikibu Diary - first visit
✓ Murasaki Shikibu Diary - Izumi and Sei
✓ Confessions of Lady Nijo: her ejection from the palace
✓ ❖ Pillow Book: 91. Once while Her Majesty was staying in the Empress's Office ...
✓ Soto-uchi — connectedness
In almost all corners of premodern Japan (in terms of era, in terms of social class, in terms of geography) membership in group(s) is essential for identity, if not survival. Removal from one's group is one of the most frightening of prospects. "Suspense" and other areas of narrative tension are often built around the anxiety-producing question: "Am I losing my group status?" Today we explore connectedness (being in groups), ijime ("bullying", the threat of being removed from the group and/or the acutal process of pushing one out of a group), and exile (this is not just being alone—this is being set outside the group to which you had membership).
*Nikki (more properly ōchō nikki bungaku 王朝日記文学 — comprised of diaries, journals, memoirs) is a wonderful genre of texts written by aristocratic women in the 10th - 11th centuries (with a few notable texts later than that) and I recommend them as a good area from which to develop a thesis for the term essay. We will not, however, focus on this genre during lectures. We read a few selections here, and will look more closely at the Pillow Book later. These women wrote about their private lives, and their private lives were very much about what groups they did or did not belong to. We read these passages as an introduction to "connectedness & exile".
"That there is" — The brain is unable to decode all at once all visual stimuli. It decodes portions and leaves the rest as a mental representation "that it is there". In reading narratives, we also get only a slim description of the world; the rest is at the level of "that it is there". When will fill out the unknown information, in the case of sight we can look in that direction; in the case of reading we use our knowledge of the world. One of the skills of accurate interpretation is learning a balance between supplying what you already know and holding back to try to learn alien information about what the "world" looks like and how it works.
Gossamer Journal basics — I presented the basics on Kagerō nikki. This is not on the mini-dictionary at this time. This is your only source of that information.
Omote/ura not as polarity — I warned against over-interpreting soto / uchi and omote / ura as antonyms, as opposites. The relationship is more complicated, as Doi well argues in his article.
Omote as the performance of ura (per Doi's article) — I extended this basic idea into the thin line between omote and ura and the importance of reading the hidden (seeing ura).
Urami and its origins in amae — I defined "amae" loosely as "acting in ways to evoke the desire of another to care for you" or "to depend on someone" and suggested that in Japan there is a high tolerance for this type of relationship and that it is a component of romantic relationships. I gave the etymology of "urami" as "ura o miru" (to see ura). I asserted, following Doi, that urami originates in the denial of amae. In this sense "jealousy" is a misunderstanding of many of the powerful "anger" stories / characters of Japanese prose. In particular, Lady Rokujō is not as much an icon of jealousy as she is an icon of urami: jealousy is when someone or something, as a third party, interferes with your possession of an object or person you desire drawing the attention of the desired object away from you and towards it or him/her. Urami doesn't involved a third party: it is the denial of amae by the person (or institution) from which you believe you deserve the ability to amae.
Helplessness — I argued that "helplessness" is under-noticed in Japanese literature and worth consideration. Helplessness can be in the realm of action or words (although, in truth, speaking is a type of action). The inability to communicate that which one wants to communicate is a running, and important theme, in premodern literature (especially that by women of the Heian period).
Feminine in literature — I did not specifically discuss this, although I gave credit for those who read Keene's article. However, if you consider the examples I used for the day (Gossamer Years / woman narrator, Genji's Rokujō / woman murderess, Asami Yamazaki (Audition) / woman villain) you might notice that I centered the discussion on various manifestations of feminine emotions. This wasn't random. Hayao Kawai (Japanese Jungian psychiatrist) argues that Japanese literature is essentially best understood through the eyes of women, a theory related to the Keene article. Yukio Mishima argued that the history of Japanese literature has been misrepresented, over-emphasizing the feminine and leaving out important masculine moments. So, the debate of the "masculinity" or "femininity" of Japanese literature pops up in a variety of ways, some more convincing than others.
✓ ❖ Rimer 1. Interior-exterior
✓ Keene Feminine Sensibility in Heian Era
✓ ❖ The Gossamer Journal
✓ ❖ Doi Omote and ura
✓ ❖ Michizane Late Winter Visit
✓ Michizane New Calligraphy at Kitano Shrine
✓ Kakizome (First Calligraphy)
✓ Soto-uchi urami
Details on translations of Kagerō nikki:
The short folktale read aloud in class is a legend common to all parts of Japan. This version is from Hiroshima prefecture, titled "The Woman Who Eats Nothing" as presented in Hayao Kawai, The Japanese Psyche. It is also on bSpace, together with the PowerPoint that presented some related images.
If you are interested in writing an essay on Japanese ghosts or other such creatures, I have a basic vocabulary as a start point at *spirits.
The very short video clip of a man and a woman in bed, then in the kitchen, if shown, is from The Ravine of Goodbye (Sayonara keikoku, さよなら渓谷, 2013).
The very short video clip of a woman looking back and smiling, with the ocean in front of her, if shown, is from Audition (1999).
The video clip of a puppet, a young woman who then transforms into an angry demon, is from Weekend Japanology, an episode on the bunraku (puppet) theater.
This segment is really two:
Main conceptual points:
Main informational points:
(Fall 2013): I gave a quick overview of the historical periods and some major breaks in the flow of development. That is now a PDF and can be found as Major poem periods (bSpace, PDF).
✓ ❖ Lyricism I - Defining lyricism
✓ ❖ Konishi on Kokin style
✓ ❖ Kokinshu kana-preface
✓ ❖ Manyoshu - Introduction by Levy
✓ ❖ Poetry reader — Manyoshu
✓ ❖ Comparing major poem anthologies
✓ ❖ Poetic forms overview
✓ Manyoshu - Nukata
✓ ❖ Manyoshu - Hitomaro
✓ Lyricism I Ways of writing kokoro
✓ Lyricism II
✓ Lyricism II-Basho poems
✓ Lyricism II-Izumi Shikibu tenarai
✓ Lyricism II-Manyo poems
✓ Lyrical poems 9th-20th c
✓ ❖ Kokin wit and kakekotoba
✓ ❖ Poetry reader — Kokinshu
✓ ❖ Poetry reader — Shin-Kokinshu
✓ ❖ Comparing major poem anthologies
✓ Shunzei and Teika compared
✓ Kobayashi Issa bio
✓ ❖ Poetry reader — Haiku
I present an image-dense PowerPoint and some video clips exploring these topics:
I present two different scheme for thinking about basic formative principles (principles that lead to specific forms):
KATŌ Shūichi's 5 cultural points (in his Form & Spirit)
- shigan 此岸 — This actual world, not spiritual / transcendent world
- groupism — "This world means this group"
- perceptual world — World as accessible via the senses rather than via cognitive action
- part-not-whole — Less interested in over-arching principles or structure / More interested in parts
- here-and-now — High valuation of this moment
Donald KEENE's 4 aesthetic principles (with quotes from Essays in Idleness)
- suggestiveness — "And are we to look at the moon and the cherry blossoms with our eyes alone? How much more evocative and pleasing it is to think about the spring without stirring from the house, to dream of the moonlight though we remain in our room!"
- irregularity — "Leaving something incomplete makes it interesting"
- simplicity — "A house, I know, is but a temporary abode, but how delightful it is to find one that has harmonious proportions and a pleasant atmosphere."
- perishability
Nothing is required for this session. This material is not tested; however, this material might prove helpful in interpreting texts and/or cultural objects and interpretation by students is, as you know, regularly expected in this course.
The content of the session is relatively abstract. Reading the principles under "Comments" above might help unclutter your mind during the presentation. This session implicitly relies in places on earlier comments about "linking".
✓ Form
COMMENT 9/24/2013: I clearly announced that test details have been published. (See Announcement for Sep 20 — remember that you are responsible for announcements. I am standing by the test details given then, not the below tentative, early note.
PRIOR COMMENT: When I've decided the format of the midterm, the details will be here. This will take the full session and will probably be in two parts: multiple choice (closed book, checking the readings and information supporting them) and essay (open book & notes, but no electronic devices, exploring the frameworks introduced: soto-uchi, kotoba-kokoro).
We now switch in this course from interpretive frameworks that have been deployed in modern times by scholars as approaches for interpretation and analysis. We begin our study of concepts that are grounded in premodern terminology. These range from aesthetic terms, to religious perspectives, to ethical values.
We begin with a pair: "okashi" and "mono no aware". If we were to think of these as "outside" and "inside" terms, "okashi" is a quality of an object that delights—often delighting the visual senses, but humor can fairly be labeled as "okashi", too. In a sense, the stimulus comes from the "outside" and causes a quick if not instantaneous reaction. "Mono no aware", which in its most general translation could be "moving" (as in "That scene moved me."), is, in contrast, less a quality of an object as it is a specific response to an object. It, in other words, "aware" arises more subjectively and is less about the object itself as it is about the emotional experience of the observer who feels aware—thus "inside" is not a bad way to think of it. This isn't a point about the psychology or biology of perception and response. Rather, it is about how the two terms were embraced in premodern times: "okashi" is a quality of an object, "aware" is a quality of a person who can respond deeply to an object. I bother making this distinction because "aware" functions more than "okashi" as a marker for "This character is a man or woman of depth" (with the protagonist of Tale of Genji, Genji, a supreme example).
I have paired these into one segment for two reasons:
Pillow Book, one of the best known prose works from the Heian period, and Tale of Genji, another of the best and written at nearly the same time, have been traditionally taught as ideal representations of "okashi" (Pillow Book) and "aware" (Genji). (This is not meant to be a contrasting pair, by the way, rather a pair at a different, more complicated, level.) It is good to read Pillow Book and Genji side-by-side and note their different qualities.
Additionally, if we shift our focus from comparing the two narratives to moving around inside the narratives, deeper readings of the Pillow Book will notice the "aware" that runs as a sub-current in the text, and more nuanced readings of Genji will notice how "okashi" is an important context for its "aware". This is my more important goal for pairing the two terms and the two texts.
At the level of grammar "okashi" and "aware" are treated nearly the same (although "okashi" is an adjective and "aware" a predicate noun). However, while the ability to be delighted by an "okashi" object is presented as a natural event widely accessible to most individuals, the ability to be moved by an "aware"-laden object requires a fully nurtured heart and is the sign of an individual's emotional maturity and sophistication. Thus feeling aware is a sign of having spiritual depth and understanding of the world.
Feeling "aware" upon observing something predates Buddhism in Japan and does not require Buddhist ideology. Nevertheless, it can quickly and easily align with it, and did. In the next segment we will consider the Buddhist-informed frame of mind called "mujōkan", and consider its relationship to "aware".
✓ Sei and Murasaki salons
✓ Sei and Murasaki salons details
✓ Sei Shonagon simple bio
✓ ❖ Pillow Book
✓ ❖ Pillow Book further selections
✓ ❖ aware with some okashi
✓ Pillow Book - Moving Things
✓ Genji basic genealogy by jrw
✓ Genji women chart
✓ Genji women clothes
✓ Genji Rokujo-In
✓ Genji Nijo estate
✓ Tale of Genji, chapters 1, 2, 4, 5, (6), 7, 9
✓ Tale of Genji, chapters 12, 13, 15*, 35, 40
Mujokan written 無常観 means the insightful, objective observation of the truth of impermanence. It is a Buddhist tehcnical term. Mujokan written 無常感, on the other hand, means one's personal sensation of impermanence. In this role, it is an avenue towards the empathetic feeling of another's fate or the keen sense of one's own fragile position. While it can be a mode of wisdom (a poised recognition of the reality of the Buddhist truth and the repercussions of it) it is more often a wash of emotion about the tragic situation of another or anxiety about one's own situation. It is, in other words, exactly the psychic pain that Buddhism identifies and warns against. Literature, in narrating this pain, both offers an accessible space to the reader (we understand the fear of uncertainty) and a reminder of the Buddhist solution.
✓ Middle period names
✓ ❖ Kamakura Buddhist reformers
✓ ❖ Hōjōki [方丈記]
✓ ❖ Essays in Idleness [徒然草]
✓ ❖ Tale of Heike, chapters 1-8
✓ ❖ Tale of Heike, chapters 9-Initiates chapter (end of story)
explain
✓ ❖ Northern and Eastern Hills culture
✓ Zeami and Yugen Tsubaki 1971
✓ ❖ Yugen
✓ Yoen
✓ Yugen by Hisamatsu
✓ Yugen by Michael Marra
✓ ❖ jo-ha-kyu
✓ ❖ Atsumori
✓ ❖ Tales of Ise [伊勢物語], nos. 1, 2, 4, 17, 23, 24
✓ ❖ The Well-Cradle (Izutsu)
I will screen the full Nō play, "The Well-Cradle" (Izutsu 井筒).
Screening begins three minutes before the regular start of class, in order to finish on time.
Most people have only seen excerpts from Nō plays because the pace is indeed truly slow. You might find the pace too slow to bear. Or, you might find the music migraine-inducing. For this reason, I'm not requiring attendance. However, I am strongly recommending attendance and will be delighted to note your presence in the room. You will have had an excellent foundation for watching the play, both in terms of the play and yūgen, and this play is known in particular for its yūgen. Although it is not live, I do think, when fully absorbed in viewing, that you can get a strong sense from the excellence of the performer, at various moments. It is unlikely you will have this sort of opportunity again for a long time, if ever, so consider setting aside 1.5 hours, draw on your patience, and have the unique experience.
explain
✓ ❖ Sabi-wabi definitions
✓ ❖ Sabi-wabi explorations
✓ ❖ Sabi-wabi graphic
✓ ❖ Poetic forms overview
✓ ❖ Genroku Masters
✓ Attendance
✓ Narrow Road - Analysis of Ichifuri section
Narrow Road to the Deep North
✓ ❖ Introduction
✓ ❖ The haibun itself
explain
✓ ❖ Bushido values via Nitobe (bSpace, PDF)
✓ ❖ Iki and sui (bSpace, PPT)
✓ ❖ Floating World Hibbett
✓ ❖ Genroku Masters
✓ Saikaku Diamond Crest
✓ ❖ Saikaku Amorous Woman (excerpt)
✓ ❖ Genroku Masters
✓ Chikamatsu skin and flesh
✓ Shinju psychology
✓ "She Loves Me, She Loves Me Not. Shinjū and Shikidō Ōkagami"
Lawrence Rogers
Monumenta Nipponica, 49:1 (1994):31-60
✓ ❖ Chikamatsu Amijima Miyamori trans
* = Item is defined at Premodern Mini-dict
† = Item is defined at Key concepts & terms
= (when on session bar)
40 or more pages of required reading is assigned.
"RQ" stands for "Readings Questions" and means that, when due, there are a set of questions for a specific reading assignment to which you are to respond. However, the questions might include reference to previous readings, since the thrust of this class is to show the inter-connectedness of certain concepts across eras and texts. They might also include specific references to lecture content, but even when not, I expect the reading to reflect the themes and goals of the course or the specific ideas we are working on around the time of the assigned reading. (In other words, the assignment is designed to subvert the idea of doing readings but skipping lectures.)
Their function is both as a channel between you and us for comments, observations and such about the reading, and as a way for us to check the quality of your reading of an assignment. They are a way of thinking about the reading assignment but answering the questions and nothing more is not considered having read the assignment with care.
They should be completed in fifteen minutes or so, not longer (not including the reading, of course!).
For Fall 2013: RQs are part of the "Engaging materials and lecture content" grade category. (Under that category, on the syllabus, I have written: "Various methods will be used to check a student's preparation for and participation in the lecture sessions.")
They absolutely must be your own work. If you have drawn from other sources and not noted them, this will be considered as plagiarism. If you have someone else write the RQ for you, or even contribute ideas to your RQ, or edit your RQ even just for English, you will 1) definitely receive an "F" for the RQ, 2) prior submissions in this category will be regraded with a new suspicion that they might not be your work and I may ask that you redo them, in my presence, 3) it is likely to alter how you submit other assignments for this grade category so that I can be sure it is your work, not that of others. If someone helped you and is a class member, that person will suffer the same penalties as you. Serious events will be reported to the University. If you are approached by someone in the class to do an RQ for them, please consider contacting me about that (the honors system only works when students decide to enforce it, it cannot be effectively protected only by faculty and staff) but, in any event, please politely decline noting the penalties involved. The rationale behind this policy: the RQ is a representative of your thinking so any action that misrepresents ideas and information as yours is a dishonest presentation of your thinking. The penalties are severe to clearly indicate how important I think this is and to protect others from the class from those who wish to pressure them to do the work for them.
RQs will either be completed in class, with the questions given at that time (closed book) or the questions will be posted on bSpace for a limited time. In the latter case, RQs are announced in class by me, and only in class. (Sorry but if you have missed a class, please do not email me asking if there is an RQ that night. Please ask someone else. Since I rarely assign RQs impromptu, it is not time-efficient to constantly be answering this question for students.)
If the RQ is not done in class, submit it as an email (not an attachment to an email) using the regular subject line plus the keyword given for it.
(When not done in class:) First 30 minutes past due, no penalty. Up to 24 hours late, 70% of given grade. Submitted during the next 24 hours, 25% of given grade. After that, no credit. The rationale behind the severe late penalty is that RQs are connected to real-time discussions in class and are meant to improve that discussion and your understanding of it. Completing them later is of considerably less value.
This is the only way a missed RQ can be made up: Within 72 hours of missing the deadline (or in-class event), please email me the reason. If accepted you will be able to make up the missing RQ during the final exam period. However, this is possible for only up to two RQs. If more than that are missing, you need to be prepared to write on any of them. You will be told at the time of the final exam period which two to answer. It will be a closed-book exercise.
The consider your answer along these lines: "Did the student read the assignment with some care and inquisitive thought? Is the point of balance in the answer on the side of the content of the material, not the student's reaction or opinion? Did the student avoid converting alien ideas into familiar ideas, when such a conversion dulls the understanding of the concept or text (as it almost always does)? Does the answer suggest clarity of understanding, to the extent that is reasonable to expect? Did the student answer the question asked, not something only resembling it?"
Avoid giving summaries of events and so forth; I am interested in your analysis. However, sometimes analysis can't be offered without some description of events and facts. Still, no credit is given for that part of the answer; it is taken only as support information to help us as readers understand what you want to say.
How should you read an assignment? Often, the session page has details on this. Here are more general statements:
We have a variety of reading assignments: academic articles, literature, and PowerPoint slides are the three primary forms.
Academic articles. These are usually dense with information. However, I assign academic articles for their concepts and perhaps, in terms of information, the handful of primary details. Please read quickly or slowly, whatever works for you to understand the concepts and theses of the article.
Literature
We are trying to read as "model readers" who were the target of the text when it was written, not modern readers. That is a valuable way, too, of reading but it is not what we do. I am always more interested (in terms of discussion) what is the content of the text not your personal opinion about it, although your personal opinion is precious. I just want that opinion to be grounded, as best as it can, on a good understanding of the text. Reading as "model readers of that time" is extremely difficult and success is measured in tiny steps. It is, nevertheless, a good reading goal. You need to both apply your understanding of the world and withhold that understanding of the world to seek at times their worldview. This is a difficult reading habit to develop and the balance between "going with what you know" and withholding interpretation because you sense "what you know" might not work well is a true skill. It will, however, serve you well in numerous future situations having nothing to do with premodern Japanese literature.
You should keep in mind the interpretive concepts we have covered when reading, where possible and where appropriate.
You should understand the basics of events.
You should try to understand the aesthetic and emotional content in its nuances and subtlties, not crude categories. So not just "loneliness" but what type of loneliness, and why is that person lonely (in terms of the culture of the day).
PowerPoints. Some PPTs are covered in class, others are not. If we covered it, it is available in case you missed class or want to review it. If it is not covered in class, treat it as a primarily information-content academic reading assignment. Please pay attention to graphics. I use PPTs not for their measured and concise delivery of information, although that can be nice. I use them because there are graphics I think are important.
This text cannot be made up except in very unusual circumstances. Write me before the exam and explain your situation. I'll make a decision. The reason needs to be very good. If you are sick on the day of the exam, write me before the exam begins. In all cases, use the usual subject line and the keyword gradeissue.
This midterm will test the contents of all sessions up until Midterm 01 except Session 01 (Orientation).
Check the "What is testable" button at the bottom of the Course Guide page to know what I have identified as testable material. Remember that some lecture information was given only in lecture, so review your notes.
You will be asked to analyze one of the prose works assigned, or a portion of it. You will not be given a choice as to which of the texts you will analyze. Reread carefully, and get the basics in your mind. More detailed responses (accuracy in names and such, where relevant) earns extra credit.
You will be asked to analyze several of the poems assigned. You will not be given a choice as to which of the texts you will analyze. Reread the poems and develop responses along the lines described below.
If you have problems seeing from a distance or for other reasons need to be seated in the front of the room, email me by Sunday, Sep 22, 5PM. Use the regular subject line and keyword MT01SEAT. If you do not use the proper email format or meet the deadline, I cannot guarantee your seat in the room. Once I build the seating chart I will not change it.
This is a closed book, closed everything exam.
Part A. There will be 10 questions based on the factual information presented so far. The topics of these 10 questions will be randomly chosen; in other words, these 10 questions are a challenging "spot check" of the factual information ("challenging" because of the large number of data points that need to be learned compared to the small number of questions that allow you to show your knowledge). The questions will be multiple choice or similar to that. They will be timed. They will be direct and "easy" (that is, you will not need to think deductively to select the correct answer — they will be a straight check of the information).
Part B. There will be one essay question asking you to apply in some specific way the concept of soto-uchi to one of the literary prose texts (so, not poetry—by the way, norito will be treated as poetry) that has been assigned.
Part C. There will be several poems from the KKS and/or SKKS and/or haiku that will ask you to interpret similar to the way we interpreted poems in class. I will identify the top and bottom for you in some cases; in other cases you will need to identify it.
Restroom visit, if necessary.
We start on time. We do not wait for your arrival. We begin with Part A so if you arrive late, you might miss the opportunity to answer some of the questions. Part A has a tough grade curve because there are only 10 questions. I strongly recommend that you be on time.
✓ You will need to bring a PENCIL for the multiple choice and whatever is a comfortable writing instrument for the essay questions.
✓ You need to memorize your SID ahead of time.
✓ You do not need to bring anything else: I will provide the answer sheets and will announce time.
✓ If you require glasses or contacts to see the front of the room, remember to bring them / use them!
There will be a seating chart.
You cannot leave during the exam. If you need to leave before the end of the exam, you will submit your test as far as you have completed it and we will grade it as is.
The test has three parts of approximately equal length. You cannot return to an earlier part. The multiple questions will have one and only one opportunity for review, if that.
You will not be able to leave early.
Either I or the GSI will grade portions of or all of your exam. Part A, Part B and Part C will be of approximately the same value in computing the test grade.
Part A. There is no extra credit on Part A. You are able to earn up to one point per question (sometimes I give partial credit upon the analysis of test statistics). The total number of points for the part is, therefore, 10. These are converted to a letter grade as follows— 10 pts: A+, 9 pts: A, 8 pts: B+, 7 pts: B, 6 pts: C, 5 pts: C-, 4-2 pts: D, less than 2 pts: F. There is no penalty for guessing incorrectly.
Part B. Extra credit is earned by accuracy of relevant information. For example, knowing the character's names rather than "the woman" or "the man" will help. Knowing the Murasaki wrote The Tale of Genji will help slightly (it is not a very challenging data point) but giving her dates will be meaningless unless your analysis specifically uses that information in a useful way. Do not scatter about memorized information.
Part C. Extra credit on this part is unlikely but excellent, on-point analysis might earn it. Your analysis should be as close to what you think would be appropriate in the context of a premodern reader. Remember that I suggested to avoid being "too conceptual" or attributing symbolism. The poetry we read is closer to "what an object is" or "what an emotion is" or "what a seasonal moment is" than it is to metaphysical / philosophical flight.
If either me or the GSI sees you looking at the answer sheet of another student, we will make a note of it. If the action is repeated, we might ask you to turn in your exam and leave the room. In either case, if it seems to me that you were looking at an answer sheet to see what was written there (and why else would you look at it?) you will receive an "F" on the exam, at minimum. Respect academic honesty and our new honor code.
The exam is about 2-3 hours long. (You may leave when you finish but I think a good answer is going to take at least close to 2 hours. Some might be able to finish more quickly.)
It is essay questions only.
It is cumulative.
It is open notes in this one way: You are welcome to bring anything that is printed on paper. You will not be allowed to use electronic devices for anything. This includes electronic dictionaries.
I will provide paper, and will run time from the front of the room.
There is a seating chart.
I will ask you to work analytically and conceptually with the material presented in the class. In order to find your way towards a good, coherent answer, you will need:
On the last day, we vote on nominations for various categories, based on student submissions earlier received. The below Final Day Form is for that purpose. For extra credit nominate as much as you would like. So I don't have to do much formatting, please use this format:
text title, character (character description), your reason for the nomination in 25 words or less, beginning with "because ..." (in other words no "I think X would be the best candidate for this nomination because ...." — just go straight to the point).
So, for example, for the first category below: "Most dysfunctional male character if living here today"
Tale of Genji, Genji (primary male character), because he would expect all women to take care of him and wouldn't meet deadlines either.
There is a serious and not serious part to this exercise.
The serious part:
I definitely want to explore cultural dissonance (characters, authors, whose ways of thinking are at odds to today's environment) so any answer needs to uphold that intent. Also, for any answer please be in good taste in your comments. Also, please don't waste my or our time with something you only spent 60 seconds thinking about.
The not-serious part:
Your answer may be serious or comic, as long as it is in good taste. When voting you can vote for any reason you chose.
You receive slight extra credit if you submit something worthwhile. You receive more extra credit if it makes the initial cut and becomes one of the handful of nominations for that day. (Therefore, you have a better chance of getting through the cut if you avoid the obvious choices, since I will select only one student per nominated candidate — if 3 people suggest Genji for the same category, I will only be selecting the best submission, that is, the submission with the most interesting, concise reasoning). You receive still more extra credit if you fare well in the voting.
Copy-and-Paste in this form into an email, in full, and answer those portions that you want, and send to me by the deadline, using the keyword FINDAYFM.
Final Day form
CULTURAL DISSONANCE
most dysfunctional male character if suddenly living here in Berkeley (in a role that approximates his role in the text, so, if an emperor, a governor of California; if a warrior, a Marine or such, etc.):
most dysfunctional female character (in a role that approximates her role in the text):
author who would be most desirable as a professor:
author who would be least desirable as a professor:
REVIEW OF LITERATURE COVERED
character, male or female, with the most courage:
most aware character:
most irritating character:
PERSONAL COMMENT
In 50 words or less share a reaction that you had to something when reading it or discussing it or reconsidering it at some later time after reading it.
My approach for this class is to provide core content but, in addition, I like to mention things that are just interesting, or can serve as start points for your essays or that might just personally interest you. That creates a lot of detailed information. I try to identify what, among all of this, is testable (that includes in-class quizzes and pop quizzes). I use the below codes as a way to communicate that and, when I make tests, quizzes and such, I look at these codes, too.
❖ Topics and assignments might have this mark. If they do, they are testable.
Content, especially in the Premodern Mini-Dict (access by button at the bottom of the Course guide page), might be in bold green font. If it is, it can be the target for specific questions. However, the rest of the text is still important as context because most of my questions need an understanding of content not just data.
This icon is sometimes on PowerPoint slides and indicates that some or all of the information on that slide is testable.
The "Notes" or "Comments" sections on the Course Guide page — both those already on the page or added later — should help give a sense of what questions I might ask.
Some lecture session content (especially video clips) is available only by being in class and might not even be mentioned on any Web page.
Comments
These are some of the session's key points, in case you missed this day:
The "flocking birds" comments today were based on Craig Reynold's 1987 thesis as discussed in This Explains Everything "Flocking Behavior in Birds" by John Naughton.